The Russian artists Vitaly Komar and Alexander Melamid (aka ‘Komar and Melamid’) began their art careers generating state-sanctioned Socialist Realism – that is to say, the kind of reverent, red-tinted imagery that comes to mind when you picture Soviet propaganda posters. Soon, however, they found themselves enmeshed in a subversive underground art movement, creating ironic, subversive and often tragicomic imagery that resulted in one of their exhibitions being literally bulldozed by their totalitarian government. Created on the occasion of a retrospective of their work at the Zimmerli Art Museum at Rutgers University in New Jersey in 2023, this short film tells the story of how the duo rose to prominence in the early 1970s before ultimately falling out over artistic and philosophical differences. In doing so, the US-based director Sam Vladimirsky explores how two rather self-serious institutions – the Soviet government and the US art world – responded to their provocations, and the irrepressible nature of creativity and expression.
Director: Sam Vladimirsky
Websites: State of the Arts, Whimsy
video
Computing and artificial intelligence
Why large language models are mysterious – even to their creators
8 minutes
video
Sports and games
Havana’s streets become racetracks in this exhilarating portrait of children at play
5 minutes
video
Spirituality
Through rituals of prayer, a monk cultivates a quietly radical concept of freedom
4 minutes
video
Fairness and equality
‘To my old master’ – a freed slave answers the request to return to his old plantation
7 minutes
video
Design and fashion
A ceramicist puts her own bawdy spin on the folk language of pottery
14 minutes
video
Animals and humans
Villagers struggle to keep their beloved, endangered ape population afloat
19 minutes
video
Art
Radical doodles – how ‘exquisite corpse’ games embodied the Surrealist movement
15 minutes
video
Language and linguistics
Why Susan listens to recordings of herself speaking a language she no longer remembers
5 minutes
video
Ethics
Plato saw little value in privacy. How do his ideas hold up in the information age?
5 minutes